XBRL Preparation Singapore: How to Handle Missing or Incomplete Data

Missing or incomplete data is one of the most common challenges Singapore SMEs face during XBRL preparation. It often only becomes obvious when validation errors appear — usually close to filing deadlines.

While missing data can feel like a blocker, it doesn’t have to derail the entire filing process if handled correctly.

Understand What “Missing Data” Really Means in XBRL

In XBRL, missing data doesn’t always mean numbers are absent.

It often refers to:

• Mandatory fields left blank
• Required disclosures omitted
• Comparative figures not provided
• Data present in PDFs but not structured in XBRL
• Balances that exist but aren’t mapped correctly

XBRL requires completeness and structure.

Identify What Is Truly Missing vs Not Applicable

A common mistake is leaving fields blank when values are zero or not applicable.

In XBRL:

• Zero values often still need to be declared
• “Not applicable” must be handled explicitly
• Blank fields may trigger rejection

Understanding this distinction reduces unnecessary errors.

Trace Data Gaps Back to Their Source

Before attempting fixes, identify where the gap originates.

Ask:

• Is the data missing from the trial balance?
• Was it excluded during financial statement preparation?
• Is it present but misclassified?

Fixing the source is always more effective than patching the output.

Avoid Guessing or Plugging Numbers

Under time pressure, some SMEs insert estimated or placeholder figures just to pass validation.

This is risky.

Plug numbers can:

• Break logical relationships
• Create inconsistencies with other statements
• Raise questions during post-submission review

It’s better to correct data properly than to force a submission.

Document and Explain Legitimate Gaps

Some data may genuinely be unavailable or not applicable.

In these cases:

• Ensure disclosures explain the absence clearly
• Use appropriate XBRL tags for non-applicability
• Maintain internal documentation for review

Clear explanations reduce follow-up queries.

Use Systems That Surface Gaps Early

Missing data becomes expensive when discovered late.

Modern systems help by:

• Flagging incomplete records earlier
• Enforcing mandatory fields upstream
• Maintaining consistency across reports

Platforms like ccMonet support accountants by generating structured Unaudited Financial Statements (UFS) from validated bookkeeping data, reducing the likelihood of missing information during XBRL preparation.

Turn Missing Data Into a Process Improvement Signal

Repeated data gaps often indicate process weaknesses, not one-off mistakes.

Common causes include:

• Delayed document collection
• Inconsistent bookkeeping practices
• Overreliance on spreadsheets

Fixing these improves not just XBRL outcomes, but overall financial quality.

XBRL Is More Forgiving Than It Looks — If Handled Properly

Missing or incomplete data doesn’t automatically mean failure. What matters is how systematically the issue is identified, explained, and resolved.

With better data discipline and the right systems, SMEs can handle gaps confidently and reduce XBRL stress over time.

👉 Learn how structured, AI-assisted financial workflows support complete, XBRL-ready reporting at https://www.ccmonet.ai/

‍