For many Singapore SMEs, XBRL filing feels uncertain right up until submission. Even after reviewing financial statements multiple times, there’s often lingering doubt: Will this actually pass ACRA validation?
The key to filing with confidence is not more checking at the end — it’s validating the right things before submission.
XBRL validation is built on accounting logic, not presentation.
Before submission, confirm that:
If these relationships don’t hold, XBRL will flag them.
XBRL doesn’t review statements in isolation.
Validate relationships such as:
These cross-checks catch issues that visual reviews often miss.
Incorrect classification is a frequent cause of rejection.
Before submission:
Misclassification can trigger logical errors even when totals are correct.
XBRL requires completeness, not just accuracy.
Verify that:
Blank mandatory fields often lead to immediate rejection.
Frequent last-minute changes increase risk.
Best practice is to:
Stable data is easier to validate accurately.
Validating the XBRL file alone is not enough.
Strong validation starts with:
This reduces the chance of hidden inconsistencies.
Platforms like ccMonet support accountants by generating Unaudited Financial Statements (UFS) from validated data, making pre-submission validation more reliable.
When validation errors appear, they usually point to upstream issues.
Instead of fixing symptoms:
This prevents recurring problems.
Successful XBRL filing isn’t about hoping for the best — it’s about knowing your data holds together logically.
When figures are validated early and systematically, submission becomes routine instead of stressful.
👉 Learn how structured, AI-assisted financial workflows support confident, low-risk XBRL filing at https://www.ccmonet.ai/