XBRL Filing Singapore: How to Handle Restated Financial Statements

For Singapore SMEs, restated financial statements can quickly complicate XBRL filing. Numbers that were previously filed now need to be revised, explanations must be clear, and the updated data must still pass ACRA’s validation checks. Without careful handling, restatements often lead to delays, rejections, and unnecessary stress.

Handled properly, however, restated financial statements do not need to derail your XBRL submission.

What Are Restated Financial Statements?

Restated financial statements are issued when previously published financial information needs to be corrected or revised. This may happen due to:

• Errors discovered after finalisation
• Changes in accounting treatment
• Corrections to classification or presentation
• Adjustments arising from reviews or audits

Restatement does not necessarily mean wrongdoing — but it does require precision and consistency in how updates are reflected.

Why Restatements Are Sensitive in XBRL Filing

XBRL is structured and comparative by nature. When figures change from a previously filed version, ACRA’s system may flag:

• Unusual year-over-year movements
• Inconsistencies between statements
• Mismatches between restated figures and disclosures

If changes are not applied consistently across all statements and notes, validation errors are almost guaranteed.

Apply Changes at the Source, Not During Tagging

One of the most common mistakes SMEs make is trying to “fix” numbers during the XBRL tagging stage.

Restatements should always be:

• Reflected in the underlying bookkeeping records
• Updated across all affected financial statements
• Finalised before XBRL preparation begins

Adjusting figures only within XBRL files often creates inconsistencies between reports.

Ensure Consistency Across All Statements and Notes

When financial statements are restated, every related component must be updated.

This includes:

• Balance sheet figures
• P&L amounts
• Equity movements
• Cash flow statements
• Notes and disclosures

XBRL validation checks will cross-reference these elements. Partial updates are one of the most common causes of rejection.

Document the Reason for Restatement Clearly

Clear documentation matters — both for compliance and future reference.

Best practice includes:

• Recording why the restatement was required
• Documenting which accounts were affected
• Ensuring disclosures align with the revised figures

This improves traceability and reduces follow-up questions from accountants, auditors, or corporate secretaries.

Run Validation Checks Early

Restated data should always go through validation checks before final submission. This helps identify:

• Structural inconsistencies
• Missing updates in linked statements
• Disclosure mismatches

Catching these early avoids last-minute panic.

Why Clean Systems Make Restatements Easier

Restatements are far easier to manage when financial data is well-structured and traceable.

SMEs using AI-powered bookkeeping platforms like ccMonet benefit from:

• Clear links between transactions and statements
• Reduced manual adjustments
• Better visibility into how changes affect reports
• AI and expert review to ensure accuracy

When data is centralised and consistent, applying and validating restatements becomes significantly more manageable.

Restatements Don’t Have to Disrupt XBRL Filing

Restated financial statements are sometimes unavoidable. The real risk lies not in the restatement itself, but in inconsistent application and poor preparation.

With disciplined updates, proper documentation, and structured financial data, XBRL filing after a restatement can still be smooth and compliant.

👉 Learn how AI-powered bookkeeping helps Singapore SMEs manage restated financial statements and XBRL filings with confidence at ccMonet

‍