Why Singapore SMEs Fail XBRL Validation Even When Numbers Match

For many Singapore SMEs, few moments are more frustrating than this:

The financial statements balance.
The totals tie perfectly.
The numbers are correct.

And yet — the XBRL validation fails.

If the figures match, what went wrong?

The answer is simple but uncomfortable: XBRL does not validate arithmetic. It validates structure.

XBRL Checks Structure, Not Just Totals

Traditional accounting focuses on whether:

• Revenue minus expenses equals profit
• Assets equal liabilities plus equity
• Figures reconcile across reports

XBRL goes further. It checks:

• Whether each figure is mapped to the correct taxonomy element
• Whether relationships between items are logically defined
• Whether disclosures align with the primary statements
• Whether prior-year and current-year structures are consistent

You can have perfect arithmetic and still fail structural validation.

1. Misaligned Tagging (Even When Amounts Are Correct)

One of the most common reasons SMEs fail validation is incorrect tagging.

For example:

• Revenue grouped under the wrong taxonomy category
• Short-term liabilities tagged as non-current
• Equity movements incorrectly classified

The numbers are correct — but the meaning assigned to them in XBRL is not.

To a human reader, the report looks fine.
To the validation engine, the structure is inconsistent.

2. Inconsistent Classification Across Years

XBRL validation often checks logical consistency between periods.

If:

• Expense categories changed without proper mapping
• Revenue streams were regrouped
• Account names evolved without structural alignment

the system may flag inconsistencies — even if totals still match.

From an accounting perspective, the change may be reasonable.
From an XBRL perspective, the structure “shifted.”

3. Broken Parent–Child Relationships

XBRL relies on defined hierarchies.

For example:

• Total assets must equal the sum of current and non-current assets
• Subcategories must logically roll up into totals

If manual adjustments were made outside the system, these relationships may break — even if totals appear correct in the final PDF.

The validator doesn’t just check totals.
It checks whether the structure supports those totals.

4. Missing or Incomplete Disclosures

Another frequent cause of validation failure is missing contextual information.

XBRL requires:

• Certain disclosures based on company size or structure
• Proper tagging of notes
• Alignment between narrative disclosures and financial figures

Even if the financial statements are complete, insufficient tagging of notes or incomplete disclosure mapping can trigger errors.

5. Manual Fixes That Disrupt Structure

Many SMEs try to fix issues directly inside the XBRL template.

This often creates new problems:

• Overriding fields manually
• Adjusting totals without updating subcomponents
• Changing values outside the accounting system

These quick fixes may solve one validation error — but break another structural rule.

Why This Feels So Confusing

From the SME’s perspective, the frustration comes from a logical assumption:

“If the numbers match, it should pass.”

But XBRL validation isn’t asking, “Do the numbers match?”
It’s asking, “Is the data structured correctly according to the taxonomy?”

Accuracy is necessary.
Structure is mandatory.

How to Reduce Validation Failures

The most effective way to avoid these issues is not to patch them at filing time — but to build structure upstream.

That means:

• Maintaining consistent classifications throughout the year
• Generating financial statements directly from system data
• Minimising spreadsheet-based rework
• Reviewing structural alignment before filing season

When financial data is structured correctly early, validation becomes a confirmation — not a battle.

Platforms like ccMonet help SMEs maintain structured, compliance-ready financial records by combining AI-powered bookkeeping with expert review. Instead of discovering structural issues during validation, inconsistencies are surfaced earlier — when they are easier to fix.

Matching Numbers Is the Starting Line, Not the Finish Line

For Singapore SMEs, understanding this distinction is critical:

Matching numbers proves arithmetic accuracy.
Passing XBRL validation proves structural integrity.

When structure is prioritised throughout the year, validation stops being unpredictable — and filing becomes far less stressful.

👉 Learn how ccMonet helps SMEs build structure-first financial systems at https://www.ccmonet.ai/

‍