
AI accounting is designed to reduce manual work—especially around transaction categorisation. But in the real world, SMEs will occasionally notice something unsettling:
A transaction is categorised incorrectly.
Maybe a supplier invoice shows up under “Marketing” instead of “COGS.”
Maybe a software subscription is posted as “Office Supplies.”
Or worse—revenue appears in the wrong income category.
So what should SMEs do when AI accounting categorisation looks wrong?
The answer isn’t to panic—or to turn off automation.
It’s to treat categorisation issues as a normal part of early optimisation and build a clear correction workflow.
Here’s a practical step-by-step guide.
First, it helps to understand that “wrong categorisation” usually comes from one of these causes:
In other words: categorisation issues are often data + structure issues, not “AI failure.”
Not every “surprising” category is incorrect.
Before changing anything, ask:
This prevents SMEs from making unnecessary changes that introduce inconsistency.
Documentation is the best truth source.
If categorisation looks wrong:
Many “AI errors” disappear once the document is reviewed.
If there is no document attached, that’s already a red flag—and should trigger follow-up.
If it’s truly wrong, correct it—but avoid “random fixes.”
Best practice:
Consistency matters more than micro-precision because it affects trend analysis and reporting.
This is the most important step.
Ask:
If it’s one-off, correction is enough.
If it’s recurring, you should treat it as an optimisation opportunity.
SMEs should not manually fix the same thing every month.
When categorisation errors repeat:
This turns “wrong categorisation” into a learning loop that improves automation.
Platforms like ccMonet are designed to support this AI + review workflow—where corrections help strengthen future accuracy rather than creating ongoing manual burden.
After correcting categorisation, SMEs should quickly review whether it affects:
Even a small misclassification can distort:
This is why SMEs should prioritise review of high-impact accounts.
To reduce future errors, SMEs should implement simple review controls:
This prevents automation mistakes from scaling silently.
Often means inventory/purchase costs are being posted as operating expenses.
Often means tools/subscriptions or contractor costs are misposted.
Usually means categories aren’t defined clearly—or AI lacks enough structured rules.
Could be timing issues, refunds, or incorrect income mapping.
When categorisation looks wrong, avoid these reactions:
Wrong categorisation is a signal.
Ignoring it creates long-term reporting and compliance risk.
Avoid duplicates like “Meta,” “Facebook Ads,” “FB.”
Frequent changes confuse both AI and humans.
Small reviews prevent big month-end surprises.
Patterns reveal what to optimise.
Yes—especially during early adoption or when new vendors/transaction types appear. The system improves through structured corrections and rule refinement.
Focus on high-impact areas first (revenue, COGS, tax-related items). Minor low-risk items can be handled through periodic review.
Yes. Misclassification can distort tax reporting, financial statements, and audit readiness.
ccMonet supports structured categorisation workflows, audit trails, and expert oversight—helping SMEs correct and optimise AI categorisation without losing control.
Learn more at https://www.ccmonet.ai/.
AI accounting isn’t about never seeing mistakes—it’s about fixing them once and preventing them from recurring.
With the right workflow, SMEs can keep automation fast and reporting reliable—without becoming accountants themselves.
👉 Discover how ccMonet helps SMEs stay in control while using AI accounting at https://www.ccmonet.ai/.