
One of the most confusing moments in bank reconciliation happens when transactions appear—but don’t quite behave as expected.
A payment shows as pending in the bank.
Another transaction is already cleared, but doesn’t appear in the books yet.
Balances look close—but not identical.
For many SMEs, pending and cleared transactions are the main reason reconciliation feels messy.
The reality is simpler than it looks—once you understand how to handle them properly.
Understanding this distinction is essential.
Pending transactions are authorized but not yet fully processed by the bank. They may:
Examples include card payments, online transfers, or batch settlements.
Cleared transactions are fully processed and finalized by the bank. They:
Reconciliation should ultimately be based on cleared transactions, not temporary ones.
Pending transactions create confusion because:
Treating pending transactions as final is one of the most common reconciliation mistakes.
Not all bank feeds behave the same way.
Check whether your feed:
This determines how reconciliation should be handled.
As a rule:
Avoid matching pending items to accounting records—they may change.
If a transaction is recorded in the books but still pending at the bank:
Do not force adjustments just to make balances match.
When pending transactions clear, some systems show:
Ensure only the cleared transaction is reconciled. Duplicate matching creates overstatements.
Pending transactions resolve quickly—often within days.
More frequent reconciliation makes it easier to:
This is especially important for high-volume businesses.
Manual reconciliation struggles with transaction status changes.
AI-assisted reconciliation systems:
At ccMonet, bank reconciliation is designed to prioritize cleared transactions—reducing false mismatches caused by temporary bank activity.
Even with automation, review is essential when:
Human oversight ensures that timing differences don’t turn into reporting errors.
This is why ccMonet combines AI-assisted reconciliation with expert review—so pending transactions are handled correctly, not rushed.
Most reconciliation issues around pending transactions come from acting too quickly.
Different banks handle pending transactions differently.
Frequency reduces confusion.
Documentation beats guesswork.
Static tools struggle with dynamic bank data.
Solutions like ccMonet are built to handle these real-world nuances.
No. Reconciliation should be based on cleared transactions. Pending items should be tracked separately.
Because they are authorizations, not final settlements. Some may be reversed or replaced.
It should be investigated and documented, especially if it remains unresolved beyond the normal clearing period.
ccMonet prioritizes cleared transactions for reconciliation and updates matches automatically as transaction statuses change, with expert review for exceptions.
Learn more at https://www.ccmonet.ai/.
Bank reconciliation isn’t about making numbers match today.
It’s about making sure they’re right once transactions are final.
Handled correctly, pending transactions stop being a source of confusion—and become just another normal part of the process.
👉 Discover how ccMonet simplifies bank reconciliation for real-world banking behavior at https://www.ccmonet.ai/.